^Free Book ⇹ The English Resistance: The Underground War Against the Normans ⇘ PDF eBook or Kindle ePUB free

William of Normandy didn t conquer England overnight after the Battle of Hastings in 1066 Several years of revolt and reprisal followed, during which William gradually consolidated his grip on his new territory Peter Rex s book is a valuable study of this fascinating and comparatively neglected period in history Review IF you want to know what happened in England between 1066 1080, this is your book Just don t read it while tired. A much overlooked facet of the Norman invasion of England is given a thorough airing by Peter Rex in this very readable book William the Bastard s usurpation of the English Crown did not go anything like as smoothly as later historians would have you believe The English fought him for years, in open battle and in ways we would recognise today as an underground resistance movement.Against the Wildmen silvatici as the Normans called them of the forests through to Eadric the Wild and Hereward later and incorrectly called the Wake , William s bunch of thugs had to fight for every inch of the kingdom This of course led to the most appalling reprisals, especially the infamous harrying of the north , when vast swathes of northern England were swept clean of life human, animal and crops by William in an act that still affects us to this day.This book highlights the struggle against what, from our perspective, seems the inevitable An essential book for the understanding of this terrible period. Interesting reading, but quite disappointing.The parallelism with occupied France during ww2 is useless, but I was most bored by little added value compared to what we can read in Augustin Thierry, history of the conquest of England by the normands, despite having been written almost 2 centuries later some very interesting details about english society, about baronial system and land value, but very scattered around and with no organization as a whole, the book misses a coherent structure making easy to go from general do detailled story and to cross society information with chronicles maps and pictures are useless The most comprehensive book one is likely to find on the period of resistance and rebellion in England following 1066 The book s only real shortcoming and the only reason it doesn t earn a 5 star rating from me is that Rex s attempts to reconcile the admittedly numerous and fragmentary sources sometimes results in a muddled narrative that makes it hard to piece together a precise chronology of events That said, anyone looking to get a sense of the English resistance during William the Bastard s early reign as England s Norman Conqueror won t do any better than this book.I would highly suggest following this book up with Rex s Hereward The Last Englishman, which is superior in its clarity and detail, though focusing primarily on Hereward s role late in the resistance movement in and around Ely. I was scandalized to learn, in seventh grade, that once ages ago, England was conquered Already I had acquired the mythic conception of England as an indomitable island redoubt, safe from whatever Continental mischief was carrying on But there, in my book, in 1066, William of Normandy lands, kills the Witan endorsed successor to the English throne, and installs himself as monarch, with a line that officially lives on today Peter Rex argues in The English Resistance that William s assault at Hastings accomplished less than is popularly believed, only giving him the title of king and command of southern England, and that historians have heretofore been too pro Norman to give the feisty Saxons their due.1066 was a brutal year for Anglo Saxon England, with no less than three battles culling its stock of leaders The depletion of ranks went a long way towards making southern England putty in William s hands, especially as he burned down villages that resisted Bearing as he did a banner blessed by the Pope, the church hierarchy in England favored his cause as welland considering their lands and knights, the bishops were no small allies The lower levels of the church, like the abbeys, were far resistant to the Norman intrusion In the north, however, the barons were unscathed, and several rebellions against William would erupt from it directly or with its support Intriguingly, one of the rebellions had the intent of routing William and establishing an Anglo Danish state, with an English client king The same death and fire approach William used to intimidate the south was leveled against the north with greater ferocity after the Bastard concluded a siege of the rebels marshy stronghold Much of the north was wasted , the fields ruined for cultivation.The English Resistance has spell in its title than it its execution, because Rex assembles the boot in a very odd way It opens with commentary on the long term consequences of the resistance, leading William to abandon his pretense of an Anglo Norman state with continuity to the old line, devotes a few chapters to different rebellions mixed with extensive discussion of one rebel s genealogy, and then to endintroduces the characters of the drama Reverse order would seem appropriate, with the many pages devoted to Hereward the Wake s forefathers and descendants left to the book Rex has written on Hereward the Wake The book tends toward the scholarly, with much discussion of source interpretation, but there are pockets of drama I might read one book by Rex to see how it compares he has written biographies of Edwin the Confessor, Harold Godwinson, Hereward the Wake, and other figures associated with the conquest That sort of devoted study promises insights to be had.Related The Fall of Saxon England, Richard HumbleDaily Life in Anglo Saxon England, Sally Crawford A far entertaining title than William the Conqueror , and much less pompous. There s a lot of interesting plot in here, showing that William s victory at Hastings did not conclusively give him the crown and that English, Scots and Danes conspired against him but ultimately didn t follow through Unfortunately it s told in a confusing and loosely edited fashion, which makes it hard to follow in addition to most French people of 1070 being named William.The author makes many allusions to the Vichy government and Nazi occupation of France, and compares Hereward the Outlaw s gang to the maquis Sadly I don t know WW2 in enough detail for that to be enlightening, unless Hereward owned a little caf in Nouviens and tried to steal Van Klomp artworks concealed in sausages. Looks at the 5 years following 1066 and all that, when William the Conqueror faced off against the remnants of Anglo Saxon nationalism This is a period I know very little about, so this book added somewhat to my store However the writing is frequently muddled and frankly rather poor in places, and while there is undoubted knowledge in the author, he struggles to get it out in a coherent fashion Rated G 2.5 5 In 1066 William the Conqueror beat Harold Godwinson at Hastings, and thus became King of England Except it doesn t end there In this book, Peter Rex details the aftermath of Hastings, in which the Norman invader sets about trying to maintain his hold on the English.History is complex It s not right to paint the aftermath as a plucky England refusing to be cowed, because for a large part that is what happened collaborators went over to William, hostages were exchanged, and most people south of the Humber just accepted the atrocities carried out by the Norman troops and tried to get on, even as they were ousted from their lands and titles to reward William s army Yet at the same time, William s rule was by no means assured Rex points out how even William seemed to consider the country won only after putting down a threatening rebellion aimed at raising the princeling Edgar the Aetheling to the throne many considered his right and managing to buy off a Danish invasion invited by the local population, both of which were real threats to him retaining his power William s harsh punishment of the north what we would term a genocide can be informed by this.While the content of the book is interesting, and it manages to be informative, the writing leaves a great deal to be desired The chronology of events Rex presents is confused by his habit of talking suddenly of things which he has not yet reached, and by his diving back to revisit earlier points, a sloshing motion meaning that the story does not grip you A dramatis personae is most welcome in a text dealing with many similar and confusing persons, but Rex inexplicably put this section right at the end of the book, where it is all but useless The book also suffers somewhat from what appears to be a prevailing bias in the source material The first half of the book covers the majority of the actual events of the resistance, while the second half covers what seems to be a reasonably small event regarding a rebel named Hereward, a figure who has been inflated to legend even gaining an invented name, the Wake , which Rex stresses is nowhere in the oldest sources While his inclusion certainly adds some specific flavour to the book, Herewald does not merit the treatment he gets two chapters are devoted entirely to his lineage and non descendants Certainly not the best presented book, but the only one I ve come across on this topic, The English Resistance provides some useful post conquest context for the interested. ^Free Book ⇴ The English Resistance: The Underground War Against the Normans ⇱ In The English Were Conquered By The Infamous Invader, William The Conqueror However, This Is Not The Whole Story The English Did Not Roll Over And Die Before Their Suppressors Far From It Peter Rex Brings To Life The Resistance, From Those Who Allied Themselves With The New Regime To Those Who Went Underground To Subvert It Such As Hereward The Wake And Edric The Wild Rex Examines William S Pacification Attempts, Alongside His Notorious Harrying Of The North